As we mentioned earlier today, the Freep’s excellent new environmental reporter Keith Matheny has a second article about Line 6B in today’s paper. We think he is doing fine work (the first story is here) and not just because he spoke with us and our friend David Gallagher (happy birthday, David!). But the one thing that stuck in our craw a little reading this story was something Jason Manshum, with his never-ending cache of hollow and misleading quotations, said:
Enbridge spokesman Jason Manshum said the company has worked with thousands of landowners along its pipelines over more than 60 years and “the vast majority of landowners we’ve worked with are pleased with negotiations.”
Now, we’ve heard this line from Enbridge reps in the past, more than once. And we’ve also commented upon it. But this time, we decided not to let it pass. And so, we dashed off the following email to Jason Manshum:
Dear Jason Manshum-
I’m hoping you can answer a few questions for me. This morning I read your comments in the Detroit Free Press and was struck by your statement that “the vast majority of landowners we’ve worked with are pleased with negotiations.” I have read similar statements from you and other Enbridge representatives in the past. As a Line 6B landowner myself, this got me to wondering:
- The article seems to suggest that this statement has to do with all landowners Enbridge has dealt with “over more 60 years.” But I’m not sure how that is relevant to this project. So, would you say that the “vast majority of landowners” on the replacement of Line 6B have been “pleased with negotiations”?
- If so, I’d be interested to know the basis upon which you make that determination. Does “pleased” mean that you didn’t have to take them to court? Would those whom you count as “pleased” include, for example, people who have never expressed any dissatisfaction publicly but who nevertheless were not at all happy with their negotiations? Would it include people for whom negotiations and/or compensation went smoothly, but who did not, say, trust their land agent or Enbridge generally? How many landowners on Line 6B have you actually spoken with? How have you gathered data otherwise? I’m just trying to understand what evidence you are drawing upon to support your assertion.
- Assuming that you are right and it is true that the vast majority of landowners have been pleased with negotiations, what would you say is an acceptable level of displeasure for Enbridge? Ten percent of landowners? Twenty? Thirty?
- Relatedly, how many landowners would you say need to be displeased in order for Enbridge to consider and/or acknowledge that they might be responsible for landowner dissatisfaction (as opposed to just assuming that unhappy landowners are just people who will never be pleased with anything)?
I don’t mean these to be rhetorical questions. Any help you can provide would be very much appreciated. I look forward to your reply.
Best,
Jeff Insko
Groveland Township, MI
We will of course provide you with a full report of Manshum’s reply if and when we receive it.
Part of Enbridge’s testimony in order to get the permit to build the new line was that the vast majority of landowners are pleased and Enbridge has very good relationships with landowners. This was perjury.. at the very least, the state of Michigan should have asked for some evidence of this claim. If we did a survey today, most people are very upset! But, most also feel they have no rights.
You’re so right, Patricia. But of course, they know that this is a practically unverifiable claim– which is why they continue to make it.
Hello , jeff and readers . Thanks for the birthday wishes . Just so everyone knows Enbridge has ever made an attempt to look at our concerns with the pipeline and when we voiced our opposition to it ,they never once bothered to have a discussion with us over our concerns . The home owners not opposed to this have no idea what tarsands oil is !
We are working with Enbridge right now and not very pleased. They are threatening to condemn our property if we don’t settle.
Ipuwall, don’t let them scare you. Condemnation is not the end of negotiations with them. Contacting an attorney who specializes in eminent domain cases may be the best way to handle this. You should not have to pay the attorney fee, as they will get paid by Enbridge. Good luck.